In the midst of the continuing debate on the mosque near ground zero the most annoying point is by those who preach tolerance. The idea of course is that to express a reasoned or for that matter unreasoned dissent is intolerant.
What is tolerance and why is it often used to squash dissent? Why is it frequently used to label those who exercise their right to free speech as hateful? Tolerance sounds great if you're the one granting it to another. It's not so hot if you are in fact the recipient of another's magnanimity in its offering. If I say to you, "Hey I can't stand you, but hey I'll put up with you anyway". Wow! What a great guy that I can "put up" with you huh?
Tolerance, however as a matter of history still has an implied sense of superiority. No society can be sustained as long as such a sentiment exists. It is a foundation built upon sand. A great society grounded in free principles provides all with the motive to live their lives consistent with their values and live a life with a force of character that rather than demanding tolerance, commands respect.
The proper criteria in determining the civilizational merits of a nation hinges on its citizens willingness to live in a state of mutual respect. It doesn't matter if we all agree or like each other. Mutual respect, not tolerance provides a solid foundation and is a mighty fine bridge over that which has divided since the dawn of man.
No comments:
Post a Comment