Don Surber made this great catch today:
Don writes:
In science, every theory is supposed to be judged by it's predictive capability versus actual reality. Not in the case of global warming where instead of proving the model is right or wrong, the experimental reality is being fudged. For the alarmist, anything that seems out of the norm (whatever that means) is due to global warming. If it doesn't snow enough, it's obviously global warming. If it snows too much? Well, that's global warming too. Never mind that no IPCC model predicts any such thing.
This is what has happened with global temperatures over the last decade:From the Miami News on June 11, 1986: Dr. James “Hansen said the global temperatures would rise by 2 to 4 degrees in the following decade,” meaning 2001-2010.
...Steven Goddard mocked James Hansen.
A good question. Another one: what does Hansen have to do to be discredited in his own field of study? Since the 90s, every single IPCC 'model' (they aren't really models - they're scenarios) have been proven to be no better than what comes out of your butt after spicy food that you're not used to. See here:
...How can a man who has been consistently wrong for 35 years be considered a scientist, let alone an expert?
No comments:
Post a Comment